The Supreme Court ruled on one of the president's signature economic achievements, which Trump has billed the tariff case as ...

The Supreme Court ruled last month at President Trump did not have the authority to issue his sweeping tariffs under a federal emergency powers law.

In recent years, a growing number of observers across the world have begun to question whether the principles of international law are applied equally to ...

The United States will intervene in the genocide case against Israel at the U.N.’s highest court, according to a filing obtained by The Associated Press.

Prosecutors at the International Criminal Court are dropping an investigation into whether U.S. sanctions against Venezuela ...

This article has been updated to include President Trump’s response to Friday’s Supreme Court ruling. So what now? As expected, the Supreme Court invalidated the Trump administration’s signature ...

This is read by an automated voice. Please report any issues or inconsistencies here. The 6-3 decision deals Trump his most significant defeat at the Supreme Court. Trump slammed the decision and said ...

The Supreme Court's decision does not affect all of Trump's tariffs but invalidates those implemented using a 1977 law called the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. Trump again called out ...

Empirical SCOTUS is a recurring series by Adam Feldman that looks at Supreme Court data, primarily in the form of opinions and oral arguments, to provide insights into the justices’ decision making ...

The Supreme Court ruled Friday that President Trump cannot use emergency powers to impose sweeping tariffs on foreign imports — leaving the White House facing the prospect of paying back tens of ...

The Supreme Court cast aside the bulk of President Trump’s sweeping tariffs Friday, obliterating a canon of his economic strategy in ruling that his use of an emergency statute to remake global trade ...