A detailed legal analysis of the United States' intervention in the International Court of Justice case, South Africa v. Israel.

Act changed how Zimbabwe's Chief Justice, Deputy Chief Justice, and Judge President are appointed. Learn about its history, provisions, court challenges, and impact on judicial independence.

The United States now joins a growing number of democratic governments and legal experts who have rejected the legal basis of ...

The Muslim Public Affairs Centre MPAC, said history will not be kind to those who chose silence in the face of injustice. The group who made this known on ...

When the then Chief of Army Staff, Ibrahim Babangida – a two-star general – turned the page on the military regime ...

The US said in a formal filing that the claim of genocide was “false” and part of a broader campaign “to delegitimize the State of Israel and the Jewish people and to justify or encourage terrorism." ...

Add us on Google When the then Chief of Army Staff, Ibrahim Babangida – a two-star general – turned the page on the military regime of Muhammadu Buhari in the last week of August 1985, political ...

As more governments take sides in South Africa's case against Israel at the U.N.'s top court, the United States is urging judges not to broaden the legal definition of genocide.

Climate cases turn on not only law and science but also judicial temperament: how judges perceive harm, risk, and responsibility over time.

The ICJ had given Israel several extensions over the last year to file the brief, with the most recent extension being until ...

The United States will intervene in the genocide case against Israel brought at the United Nations' highest court by South Africa, arguing that the accusations are false and warning that a ruling ...